The lawful and concrete bond between a parent and the child,and the right to take decisions for the child is referred to as child custody. Likewise, it is the parent’s duty to care for the child.In this particular case, the courtroom becomes a battle field for parents who are disputing child custody. Judges today are ordering the evaluation of the family by experts in the field of child psychiatry, psychology or mental health.
The child psychiatry characteristically evaluates the activities of each parent, the life at home, parenting skills, relationships with the child, the child’s feelings and preferences. In many cases,psychological testing is utilized. The endorsements of the expert involved can be the foundation to a custody agreement. However, this can be rejected by the two parties letting the judge have the final say.
Many separated parents with children, when asked why they ended up with the custody of child;the answer will simply be “it was the judge’s decision.” In other words, the decision is based on someone else’s conclusion. Moreover, it has an authoritative decision and only has based on his/her or her belief of what was in the child’s best interest.
However, judges do not just make the child custody decision or pick out the parenting plan arrangement for the parents.In fact, it is usually when the parents are unable to reach an agreement on child custody, the judge will decide and make ready the proper rearing arrangement for them. Furthermore, if the judge makes the custody decision for the parents, it is the result of final judicial order on child custody.
Normally, it is the parent who knows what is best for their children. One example is the ability of the parent to maintain the utmost health of the children by providing nutritious foods like chia seed drink. Nonetheless, the difficulty for the parents is usually the failure to set apart their own sentiments and aspirations from the needs of the child. The greatest amount of flexibility in choosing a child rearing plan is given to parents who reflect the best interest of their child.
However, when the parents fail to come to an agreement on child custody, the judge will be given the task to make the decision about child custody. Likewise, they will also have a tremendous amount of leniency in choosing a childcare plan that he/she thinks is best for the child.
This leaves wider scope for a judge’s justification of what is in the best interest of the child. This leads to subjective judicial decisions regarding child custody.